DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
ce
-o the provisions of
= ~~ & T3ns © any fey aaa eA ~F arcoixr nave
9 your app.iice tion ror correction or your naval
panel of the Board f Cr tion Val Record
sxecutive session, consi j 5 1
Your allegations oi 1 injust
n with administrative regulations and proc
appli the proceedings of this Bo i
considered by the Board consisted of PE
1l material submitted in support thereof, you
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
a
nsidered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC memo
January 2015, a copy of which is attacne
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
within one year from the date of the Board's decision. New evidence
is evidence not previously considerec by the Board prior to making its
j
5
are entitled to have the Boara
}
decision in your case. In this re ard, it is important to keep in
mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records.
Docket No. NR7384-14
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of
probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
TAY 74
Yu 0 Cf eat?
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
Enclosure: HQMC memo 1070 JPL2 dtd 9 Jan 15
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6707 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6803 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by HQMC memo 1400/3 MMPR-2 dated 13 February 2015 and HQMC memo 1400/3 MMPR-2 dated 18 November 2014, copies of which are attached. NR6803-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03760-99
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 7 June 1999, and the memorandum furnished by HQMC dated 25 August 1999, copies of which are attached. c. First Sergean explanations into is no excuse for Officer and Adverse Sighting Officer. Contrary to the information included in subparagraph 3b of reference (b), further research indicates that the Adverse Sighting Officer (Lieutenant Colone fitness...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05689 11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2012. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC Memo 5000 RFF-DOSS02 dated 21 Jun 12 and HOMC Memo 1650 MMMA-3 dated 13 Oct 11, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3792 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC memo 7220 MPO of 12 Aug 14, a copy of which is attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5167 14
I was medically separated with 100% service connected disability.” You further claim that “I attended Tap and Tamps in Camp Pendleton and was told that I could transfer my benefits anytime I wanted even after leaving the armed forces.” The Board found you have provided no proof to back up your claim that you were given misleading information on when you could transfer your ‘benefits. considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02021-99
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by HQMC, dated 24 May 1999, and the Marine Corps Recruiting Command, dated 12 July 1999, copies of which are attached. a. Petitioner seeks removal from his records of all reference to his conviction by summary court-martial. Accordingly, we recommend relief be granted to the extent of ordering the removal from Petitioner's records of all references to his conviction at summary court-martial and all performance evaluations or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6705 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7569 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 March 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10656 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC memo 1400/3 MMPR-2 dated 27 February 2015, a copy of which is attached. NR10656-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...